This websites use cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more details about cookies and how to manage them, see our cookie policy.


The Lawyer's Top 10 Appeals of 2022

Maitland Chambers

20 January 2022

We are pleased to see two appeals that our members are involved in this year feature in The Lawyer’s Top 10 Appeals of 2022:

On Tower UK v AP Wireless II UK

Christopher Pymont QC, with Wayne Clark and Fern Schofield (Falcon Chambers) are instructed by Thekla Fellas and Karen Mitchell of Eversheds Sutherland, and will be representing the appellant, AP Wireless II UK, for the Appeal in the Supreme Court which is listed for 1-3 February 2022.

This case will be the first Supreme Court case ruling on who is an occupier for the purposes of the Telecommunications Code. The Court of Appeal judgment can be found here.

Marcus A. Wide and Hugh Dickson (joint liquidators of Stanford International Bank) v HSBC Bank

Christopher Parker QC and James Knott (4 Stone Buildings) are instructed by Stewarts and will be representing the Appellants in this matter which was listed in the Supreme Court for 19 January 2022. The Appeal in the Supreme Court is regarding the strike-out of the Quincecare claim, following the Court of Appeal judgment which can be found here.

For further information, and the full list of The Lawyer’s Top 10 Appeals of 2022, please click here.

View all news

Recent News

LA Micro Group (UK) Ltd. v LA Micro Group, Inc ...

Company, Partnership & LLPs, Judgments

03 March 2023

Andrew Twigger KC succeeded in the Court of Appeal in upholding the Judge’s order, despite the Court ...

Read more

Dismissal of high-profile challenge to the appo...

27 February 2023

Michael Gibbon K.C. and Darragh Connell (acting for the joint administrators) and Nicholas Peacock K.C. and Edward Granger (acting for the appointing party) successfully resisted an expedite...

Read more

High Court judgment handed down in highly antic...

27 February 2023

A highly anticipated judgment has been passed down from the High Court, allowing for service via Non-Fungible Token (NFT) on a defendant as the sole means of service.

Read more