Maxim Cardew represented the successful applicants in Mohammed v Patel [2024] EWHC 2581 (Ch) in their application for a declaration and injunctive relief calling for fresh elections to the Executive Committee of a Charity operating a substantial mosque. The case concerned the correct construction of the constitution of the Charity (an unincorporated association), the lawfulness of a previous election that had been held, and the appropriate test for granting declaratory and injunctive relief in such circumstances. The decision also considered whether and in what circumstances the constitution of a charitable unincorporated association could be waived or varied....
READ MORE
We are delighted to be ranked once again in The Legal 500 across all our core areas of practice. Thank you very much to our clients and colleagues across the profession for their feedback and for the interesting and challenging instructions sent our way. Our clerking team has also rightly received excellent comments from the market. The Legal 500 UK Bar Guide 2025 is now available to view online. You can view the rankings for Chambers and its barristers here....
READ MORE
We are delighted to welcome Robert Watt, Olivia Horn and Promit Chatterjee as members of Maitland, following the successful completion of their pupillages....
READ MORE
Judgment has been handed down in D’Aloia v Persons Unknown, Bitkub & Ors [2024] EWHC 2342 (Ch). Darragh Connell and Eoin MacLachlan, instructed by Nicola McKinney of Quillon Law, acted on behalf of a crypto exchange, Bitkub Online Co. Ltd (“Bitkub”), in successfully defending a claim brought by Fabrizio D’Aloia. Following a 5-day trial, the High Court held that the Claimant had failed to establish that any of his misappropriated USD Tether had reached the relevant wallet controlled by Bitkub, the sixth Defendant in the proceedings. The entirety of the Claimant's claims against Bitkub in unjust enrichment and as an alleged constructive trustee were dismissed. The judgment considers, for the first time following a contested trial, the status of USD Tether under English law. The High Court concluded that USD Tether did constitute property for the purposes of English law as follows: ...
READ MORE
What is the appropriate order for costs following the continuation of a freezing injunction after a contested return date hearing? Is it the usual order for interim injunctions of costs reserved, or do costs follow the event because freezing injunctions are materially different to normal interim injunctions? These are questions which have caused debate on the authorities. ...
READ MORE
Having helped lead the way at the Commercial and Chancery Bar over the last 5 years with its own award-nominated mentoring scheme for underrepresented groups, Maitland is delighted now to join the wider scheme run by Combar - The Commercial Bar Association. ...
READ MORE
On 23 August 2024, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Payroll & Pension Services (PSS Umbrella Company) Limited [2024] EWCA Civ 995....
READ MORE
We are delighted to announce that Maitland and a number of our barristers have been shortlisted for awards at this year’s Chambers and Partners UK Bar Awards 2024. Our nominations are as follows:Company / Insolvency Silk of the Year - Catherine Addy KCCompany / Insolvency Junior of the Year - Rebecca PageCompany / Insolvency Set of the Year - MaitlandThe awards ceremony will be taking place on Thursday, 14 November 2024 and the full shortlist can be found here....
READ MORE
The High Court has handed down judgment at the interim stage in the case of Cancrie Investments v. Haider. George Hayman KC and Duncan McCombe represented the Claimant, who was successful in having its worldwide freezing injunction continued and in resisting applications to strike out the claim and/or for reverse summary judgment. The judgment engages with the following interesting points with both procedural and substantive significance:...
READ MORE