This websites use cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more details about cookies and how to manage them, see our cookie policy.

News

Primekings Holding Ltd & Ors v King & Ors (Re Kings Solutions Group Ltd) [2021] EWCA Civ 1943

Company, Partnership & LLPs, Judgments

17 December 2021

In a Judgment handed down on Friday 17 December 2021, the Court of Appeal has confirmed that the true ratio of the Court of Appeal majority in Graham v Every [2015] 1 BCLC 41 is that there must be a causal connection between personal actions of a shareholder or third party and some other act or omission constituting conduct of the company’s affairs, for such matters to be pleaded in support of a claim for relief pursuant to section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 (unfair prejudice petition proceedings). 

The Court held that whilst the Judge below correctly identified the law he subsequently erred in applying it to the pleaded claim.  The pleaded (disputed) personal conduct of the shareholder and directors (which largely related to steps taken in pursuit of the recovery of their costs of previous failed litigation by the petitioners) should therefore have been struck out. It could not found a claim for relief pursuant to section 994 of the Act and “[t]he principle that statements of case should only set out the facts that go to make up each essential element of the cause of action relied upon is particularly relevant to pleadings in unfair prejudice petitions” (which frequently involve parties seeking to raise myriad extraneous personal grievances).  The Court of Appeal accepted the Appellants’ submissions that such proceedings must be properly limited in scope. 

The matters relating to various costs recovery proceedings between the parties also fell to be struck out on the grounds of abuse of process (affirming the analysis in the Judgment of Cockerill J in King & Ors v Stiefel & Ors [2021] EWHC 1045 (Comm)).

Catherine Addy QC, instructed by Macfarlanes LLP (James Popperwell, Ed Llewelyn-Evans and their team) and leading Joseph Sullivan, appeared for the successful Appellants.  The unanimous Judgments of the Court of Appeal shine a welcome light on the importance of such shareholder claims being confined to their proper scope.

A copy of the Judgment of the Court of Appeal can be here (and a copy of the Judgment of Cockerill J can be found here).

View all news

Recent News

National Investment Bank Ltd. v Eland Internati...

Arbitration/ADR, Judgments

17 May 2022

The Commercial Court today handed down judgment considering important matters of principle in relation to election by waiver and res judicata/issue estoppel in the arbitration context i...

Read more

Sarah Butler-Sloss and Ors v The Charity Commis...

Charities, Judgments

29 April 2022

The High Court has handed down judgment on 29 April 2022 regarding charity trustees’ duties when exercising their powers of investment. Maxim Cardew appeared for the successful Cl...

Read more

Silk Appointments

Appointments, Maitland Chambers

21 March 2022

Many congratulations from all at Maitland Chambers to our new Silks, Andrew Westwood QC and Thomas Munby QC.

Read more