This websites use cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. For more details about cookies and how to manage them, see our cookie policy.

Cases Maxim Cardew

Shop Direct Finance Company Limited v The Official Receiver

Judgment Date: 06 Jun 2022

Michael Gibbon QC and Maxim Cardew acted for the Official Receiver in Shop Direct Finance Company Limited v The Official Receiver [2022] EWHC 1355 (Comm) concerning bulk PPI complaints.

View case

Members
Maxim Cardew
Michael Gibbon QC

Practice areas
Banking & Financial Services
Insolvency & Restructuring

Sarah Butler-Sloss and Others v The Charity Commission and HM Attorney General

Judgment Date: 29 Apr 2022

The High Court handed down judgment in Sarah Butler-Sloss and Others v The Charity Commission and HM Attorney General [2022] EWHC 974 (Ch) on 29 April 2022.

View case

Members
Maxim Cardew

Practice areas
Charities

EMI v Prudential (2020)

Judgment Date: 31 Jul 2020

John McGhee QC and Maxim Cardew successfully appear for Prudential (the landlord) in a claim brought by EMI (the guarantor) in relation to a lease of valuable commercial premises on Oxford Street formerly occupied by HMV. Maxim also analyses the decision in an article, which can be found here.

View case

Members
Maxim Cardew

Practice areas
Real Estate

(1) Maria Galazi (2) Iphegenia Galazis (Claimants) v (1) Christopher Christoforou & 5 Ors (Defendants) & Wellsford Securities Ltd (Third Party) & Ors

Judgment Date: 26 Mar 2019

The court construed the words "claim" and "proceedings" in CPR Pt 38 when determining that substantial amendments made by the claimants to their particulars of claim effectively amounted to discontinuance so that they were subject to the default position under r.38.6(1) that a discontinuing party was liable to pay the other parties' costs. It considered the correct approach to the absence of a notice of discontinuance and examined the costs consequences of discontinuance and amendment.

View case

Members
Maxim Cardew
Thomas Grant QC

In the Matter of TPD Investments Ltd Sub Nom Destiny Investments (1993) Ltd v TH Holdings Ltd (2017)

Judgment Date: 31 Mar 2017

The court determined the appropriate remedy in a case of unfair prejudice within the meaning of the Companies Act 2006 s.994. It considered the fair value of the petitioners' shares in the company concerned, whether the percentage of shares attributable to them should be increased, and whether any personal liability should attach to the directors of the respondent company and the company concerned.

View case

Members
Catherine Newman QC
Maxim Cardew